新加坡民航局（CAAS）设立新服务网站，为本地消费者提供另一个购买促销或便宜机票的管道，也希望吸引更多过境新加坡的外国旅客逗留和观光。
这个全新网站名为ViaSingapore.com，公众可通过该网站查询往返新加坡的客机机票价格，在“货比三家”后也能立即在网上订购主要航空公司或廉价航空公司的机票。
民航局昨天发文告说，ViaSingapore的搜索引擎具备搜索超过100个网站的实时资料功能，可以根据用户所处的国家和所提出的要求为他们搜寻价格最低廉的飞机票。此外，该网站也借助樟宜机场与区域的广泛连通性（connectivity），让网站用户从中获取旅游资料，并以新加坡作为旅游起点或到亚太其他区域游玩。
民航局局长林金春说：“这个网站将为旅游者提供一站式服务，能让他们以最理想的飞机票价来新加坡旅游或探索亚太其他区域。民航局积极提升新加坡樟宜机场作为航空枢纽的魅力，这个网站的设立是民航局在这方面所作的其中努力。”
ViaSingapore.com的搜索引擎具备搜索超过100个网站的实时资料功能，可以根据用户所处的国家和所提出的要求为他们搜寻价格最低廉的飞机票。
文告说，ViaSingapore.com所推出的特价促销，将会是这个网站独有的。除了能搜寻价格具有吸引力的机票，用户可以通过这个网站寻找合意的旅游配套和酒店住宿等资料。外国旅客也能从中获知有关新加坡好去处和最新的活动消息，并且提供本地各个旅游景点的观光游配套，吸引过境的外国旅客在本地逗留。
为了配合ViaSingapore网站的正式启用，本地廉价航空公司捷星亚洲（Jetstar Asia）在网站上推出飞往曼谷的90元单程机票（包括燃油附加费和其他税务费），供顾客订购，促销日期从本月14日到19日。
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Airfares to KL in freefall
THE Singapore-Kuala Lumpur route, monopolised for so long by the national carriers of the two countries which routinely charged return fares in excess of $400, is opening up with some aggressive promotions. Travellers are spoilt for choice.
Malaysia Airlines (MAS) has become the first to throw down the gauntlet, with its 'One Price, All Seats, All Flights' online promotion offering one-way, economy-class fare on its flights from Singapore to Kuala Lumpur for $89 nett.
MAS also dropped its fares for flights from Singapore to Penang, Langkawi, Kota Kinabalu and Kuching, offering similar $89 nett one-way, economy-class fares to these destinations. This represents a reduction of up to 78 per cent of the lowest normal online fares on these routes.
The move comes ahead of the liberalisation of the Singapore-Kuala Lumpur route from Dec 1, and services between Singapore and East Malaysia, which starts next week. Not to be outdone, Tiger Airways has charged into the battle with one-way fares between Singapore and Kuala Lumpur at $29 (RM69), all inclusive. AirAsia and Jetstar Asia have also launched a slew of additional services, beginning next month, between the two major cities. And flights between Singapore and the East Malaysian towns of Kuching and Kota Kinabalu begin next week.
Singapore Airlines (SIA) and SilkAir have launched promotional return fares to Kuala Lumpur at $293 nett, and to Penang at $313 nett. While these may still appear to be on the high side, they are a sharp markdown to what SIA, a premier airline, used to charge in the days when it monopolised the route along with MAS.
Meanwhile, Jetstar Asia's CEO Chong Phit Lian said that her airline had already been cutting fares on the route for several weeks.
'Yes, we have already started cutting fares to KL with everyday low fares,' she informed. 'But next week, we will embark on even more aggressive fare reductions on our website.'
AirAsia has been trying to out-manoeuvre its rivals by scrapping fuel surcharges (a move which will lop off $20 from ticket prices) in an effort to try to lure passengers.
In addition, the budget carriers are also offering several tens of thousands of 'free tickets' during the month of December to commemorate the further liberalisation of routes between Singapore and the Malaysian destinations.
All this comes after Malaysia and Singapore decided to fast-track their air connectivity by liberalising routes between Changi and several Malaysian destinations. This has resulted in a scramble by both legacy carriers and low-cost carriers to launch more flights and compete more aggressively for passengers.
In about three weeks, flights between the Republic and Kuala Lumpur are set to double to 29 daily as AirAsia, SilkAir, Jetstar Asia and Tiger battle it out against incumbents Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines.
Interestingly, the fare battle comes as the global aviation industry - including Asia-Pacific carriers - is wrestling with the impact of a widening global economic slowdown.
In a statement issued yesterday, the Association of Asia-Pacific Airlines (AAPA) noted that passenger and cargo demand had already fallen dramatically in recent months, with expectations of a further deterioration during the first half of 2009.
'Oil prices are likely to remain subdued given continuing weak economic conditions,' AAPA said. 'This should enable carriers to keep fares competitive and help maintain travel demand at a time of diminished consumer confidence.'
Malaysia Airlines (MAS) has become the first to throw down the gauntlet, with its 'One Price, All Seats, All Flights' online promotion offering one-way, economy-class fare on its flights from Singapore to Kuala Lumpur for $89 nett.
MAS also dropped its fares for flights from Singapore to Penang, Langkawi, Kota Kinabalu and Kuching, offering similar $89 nett one-way, economy-class fares to these destinations. This represents a reduction of up to 78 per cent of the lowest normal online fares on these routes.
The move comes ahead of the liberalisation of the Singapore-Kuala Lumpur route from Dec 1, and services between Singapore and East Malaysia, which starts next week. Not to be outdone, Tiger Airways has charged into the battle with one-way fares between Singapore and Kuala Lumpur at $29 (RM69), all inclusive. AirAsia and Jetstar Asia have also launched a slew of additional services, beginning next month, between the two major cities. And flights between Singapore and the East Malaysian towns of Kuching and Kota Kinabalu begin next week.
Singapore Airlines (SIA) and SilkAir have launched promotional return fares to Kuala Lumpur at $293 nett, and to Penang at $313 nett. While these may still appear to be on the high side, they are a sharp markdown to what SIA, a premier airline, used to charge in the days when it monopolised the route along with MAS.
Meanwhile, Jetstar Asia's CEO Chong Phit Lian said that her airline had already been cutting fares on the route for several weeks.
'Yes, we have already started cutting fares to KL with everyday low fares,' she informed. 'But next week, we will embark on even more aggressive fare reductions on our website.'
AirAsia has been trying to out-manoeuvre its rivals by scrapping fuel surcharges (a move which will lop off $20 from ticket prices) in an effort to try to lure passengers.
In addition, the budget carriers are also offering several tens of thousands of 'free tickets' during the month of December to commemorate the further liberalisation of routes between Singapore and the Malaysian destinations.
All this comes after Malaysia and Singapore decided to fast-track their air connectivity by liberalising routes between Changi and several Malaysian destinations. This has resulted in a scramble by both legacy carriers and low-cost carriers to launch more flights and compete more aggressively for passengers.
In about three weeks, flights between the Republic and Kuala Lumpur are set to double to 29 daily as AirAsia, SilkAir, Jetstar Asia and Tiger battle it out against incumbents Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines.
Interestingly, the fare battle comes as the global aviation industry - including Asia-Pacific carriers - is wrestling with the impact of a widening global economic slowdown.
In a statement issued yesterday, the Association of Asia-Pacific Airlines (AAPA) noted that passenger and cargo demand had already fallen dramatically in recent months, with expectations of a further deterioration during the first half of 2009.
'Oil prices are likely to remain subdued given continuing weak economic conditions,' AAPA said. 'This should enable carriers to keep fares competitive and help maintain travel demand at a time of diminished consumer confidence.'
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Murdoch: Aussies ill-prepared
MEDIA magnate Rupert Murdoch said on Sunday that Australians were poorly prepared to live in a global economy and may 'learn the hard way' what it means.
Speaking amid the most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s, Mr Murdoch cited the recent fluctuations in the value of the Australian dollar as evidence of Australia vulnerability to world markets.
The rise of China and India as economic superpowers, each with a new, vast and ambitious middle class, posed special challenges for Australia, and the country would need to adapt.
'Over the next 30 years or so, two or three billion people will join this new global middle class,' Mr Murdoch said at the Sydney Opera House. 'The world has never seen this kind of advance before. These are people who have known deprivation.
'These are people who are intent on developing their skills, improving their lives and showing the world what they can do. And they live right in Australia's neighbourhood.'
The Aussie has lost 15 per cent this month as investors unwound carry trades and dumped commodity currencies on expectations that a global recession would hurt demand for natural resources. Australia is a big exporter of commodities.
On Sunday, the Assistant Treasurer Chris Bowen said confidence globally should get a lift once the US presidential election was out of the way on Tuesday, including in the Australian economy.
Australia has announced a set of measures to deal with the financial crisis, including a stimulus package for households and a government guarantee on local bank deposits, to shield them from the credit crisis.
But Mr Murdoch said Australia's '19th century education system' and the poor living conditions of much of its indigenous population were key hurdles to be overcome, Mr Murdoch said, urging the country of his birth to recover its frontier spirit and position itself as a centre of excellence.
'Australia is wedded to the world - mostly for richer, very occasionally for poorer, certainly for better, and only rarely for worse. And I fear that many Australians will learn the hard way what it means to be unprepared for the challenges that a global economy can bring.'
Australians needed to become less dependent on government handouts and the country must remain open to immigration, he said.
Australia must tap on its advantages of an open, democratic and multi-racial society, built on the rule of law.
'To compete well and use our human capital to the best, we will have to draw on these advantages and make our country stronger. That means being less dependent on government, less complacent about our national institutions, more willing to accept radical reform, and more trusting in our creativity and our competence.
The Australian-born media magnate, who now mainly lives in the United States but whose News Corporation still controls a large part of the Australian media, was giving the first of six lectures in a series known as the 'Boyer Lectures'.
Speaking amid the most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s, Mr Murdoch cited the recent fluctuations in the value of the Australian dollar as evidence of Australia vulnerability to world markets.
The rise of China and India as economic superpowers, each with a new, vast and ambitious middle class, posed special challenges for Australia, and the country would need to adapt.
'Over the next 30 years or so, two or three billion people will join this new global middle class,' Mr Murdoch said at the Sydney Opera House. 'The world has never seen this kind of advance before. These are people who have known deprivation.
'These are people who are intent on developing their skills, improving their lives and showing the world what they can do. And they live right in Australia's neighbourhood.'
The Aussie has lost 15 per cent this month as investors unwound carry trades and dumped commodity currencies on expectations that a global recession would hurt demand for natural resources. Australia is a big exporter of commodities.
On Sunday, the Assistant Treasurer Chris Bowen said confidence globally should get a lift once the US presidential election was out of the way on Tuesday, including in the Australian economy.
Australia has announced a set of measures to deal with the financial crisis, including a stimulus package for households and a government guarantee on local bank deposits, to shield them from the credit crisis.
But Mr Murdoch said Australia's '19th century education system' and the poor living conditions of much of its indigenous population were key hurdles to be overcome, Mr Murdoch said, urging the country of his birth to recover its frontier spirit and position itself as a centre of excellence.
'Australia is wedded to the world - mostly for richer, very occasionally for poorer, certainly for better, and only rarely for worse. And I fear that many Australians will learn the hard way what it means to be unprepared for the challenges that a global economy can bring.'
Australians needed to become less dependent on government handouts and the country must remain open to immigration, he said.
Australia must tap on its advantages of an open, democratic and multi-racial society, built on the rule of law.
'To compete well and use our human capital to the best, we will have to draw on these advantages and make our country stronger. That means being less dependent on government, less complacent about our national institutions, more willing to accept radical reform, and more trusting in our creativity and our competence.
The Australian-born media magnate, who now mainly lives in the United States but whose News Corporation still controls a large part of the Australian media, was giving the first of six lectures in a series known as the 'Boyer Lectures'.
Saturday, September 20, 2008
宝钢再次下调钢铁价格 调整幅度多在800元/吨
继稍早将10月价格下调后，昨天，国内钢铁价格的风向标——宝钢再次下调钢铁产品价格，钢坯、热轧、冷轧等全面下调，调整幅度多在800元/吨。
下半年以来，我国钢铁价格结束了上半年的一路上涨，宝钢连续下调10月和11月价格无疑使不景气的钢铁市场雪上加霜。
据宝钢下发给宝钢国际各地区公司及专业公司、销售中心的通知显示，经该公司价格委员会研究决定，11月宝钢股份公司钢铁产品价格在10月份价格基础上再次调整。
此次调整涉及钢坯、热轧、冷轧、彩涂等13个大类，下调幅度普遍在700-800元/吨，降幅最大的一个钢坯品种B40下调2500元/吨。
据了解，宝钢之所以下调钢价，根本原因是国内市场需求下降。记者了解到，目前，国内多家钢厂正在通过各种方式减产、停产以应对低迷的市场。其中，武钢预计在9月开始检修部分设备，而宝钢方面表示，目前订单不足，需求不旺。
面对低迷的钢材市场，宝钢集团董事长徐乐江坦言，在通胀压力、经济增长放缓和下游行业需求减弱的宏观背景下，钢铁行业盈利的潜在风险和困难明显增加。他表示，自2002年开始的一轮钢铁业快速增长周期的拐点已经出现，中国钢铁业将告别过去几年运行的旧模式——靠需求旺盛、产品价格上涨、大家都赚钱的发展模式。中国钢铁行业正在步入高成本时代，依靠低成本、拼价格的竞争方式走到了尽头。中国钢铁产业必须加快兼并重组、加速产业结构升级来应对全球经济的波动和衰退。
下半年以来，我国钢铁价格结束了上半年的一路上涨，宝钢连续下调10月和11月价格无疑使不景气的钢铁市场雪上加霜。
据宝钢下发给宝钢国际各地区公司及专业公司、销售中心的通知显示，经该公司价格委员会研究决定，11月宝钢股份公司钢铁产品价格在10月份价格基础上再次调整。
此次调整涉及钢坯、热轧、冷轧、彩涂等13个大类，下调幅度普遍在700-800元/吨，降幅最大的一个钢坯品种B40下调2500元/吨。
据了解，宝钢之所以下调钢价，根本原因是国内市场需求下降。记者了解到，目前，国内多家钢厂正在通过各种方式减产、停产以应对低迷的市场。其中，武钢预计在9月开始检修部分设备，而宝钢方面表示，目前订单不足，需求不旺。
面对低迷的钢材市场，宝钢集团董事长徐乐江坦言，在通胀压力、经济增长放缓和下游行业需求减弱的宏观背景下，钢铁行业盈利的潜在风险和困难明显增加。他表示，自2002年开始的一轮钢铁业快速增长周期的拐点已经出现，中国钢铁业将告别过去几年运行的旧模式——靠需求旺盛、产品价格上涨、大家都赚钱的发展模式。中国钢铁行业正在步入高成本时代，依靠低成本、拼价格的竞争方式走到了尽头。中国钢铁产业必须加快兼并重组、加速产业结构升级来应对全球经济的波动和衰退。
Saturday, June 7, 2008
China banks facing US$7.2 billion in quake-related write-offs
Mainland banks will likely write off 50 bln yuan in loans from borrowers rendered unable to pay due to the earthquake, the South China Morning Post reported, citing Xu Chengfa, deputy general manager of Bank of Communications.
"(The total) could be as much as that amount. But almost all the damaged buildings are in rural areas and this limits banks' exposure; the impact to us will be minimal," the Hong Kong newspaper cited Xu as saying.(1 usd = 6.9 yuan)
"(The total) could be as much as that amount. But almost all the damaged buildings are in rural areas and this limits banks' exposure; the impact to us will be minimal," the Hong Kong newspaper cited Xu as saying.(1 usd = 6.9 yuan)
Sunday, April 13, 2008
楼市定时炸弹几时爆？
因为丰隆集团主席郭令明的一番话，延迟付款计划又成了舆论的焦点。虽然国家发展部长马宝山隔天迅速灭火，浇熄了让计划死灰复燃的任何机会，但是这个实施十年的促销计划未必就此永埋地底。
虽然官方数据显示，今年第一季的私宅价格仍在上升，但最近的成交量显示，一些高档共管公寓的价格其实已经开始走软，跌幅甚至高达20％。
如果美国局势对本地的冲击比想象中大、楼市继续恶化，过去几年以延迟付款计划卖出的房子，难保不会在明后年像“定时炸弹”一样，在市场造成震动。
但最令人不安的问题是，大家至今都还是不清楚，到底有多少“定时炸弹”已埋在地下？
虽然官方数据显示，今年第一季的私宅价格仍在上升，但最近的成交量显示，一些高档共管公寓的价格其实已经开始走软，跌幅甚至高达20％。
如果美国局势对本地的冲击比想象中大、楼市继续恶化，过去几年以延迟付款计划卖出的房子，难保不会在明后年像“定时炸弹”一样，在市场造成震动。
但最令人不安的问题是，大家至今都还是不清楚，到底有多少“定时炸弹”已埋在地下？
Buy and hold ? Not this banker
Swiss banker Wilfried Kofmehl, 43, has spent his entire working life in private banking - and he loves it.
'It's very difficult to be in this business. Clients expect you to be on top of financial news 24/7. But it's a wonderful job,' said Julius Baer's head of private banking in South-east Asia.
When it comes to his personal financial plans, he points to his four key 'pillars', which include compulsory and voluntary savings schemes administered by the Swiss government. In addition, he has investments in properties and other financial instruments such as stocks, unit trusts and bonds.
Instead of relying on a passive buy-and-hold investment strategy, he has become more proactive in his investing approach in the past few years.
Said Mr Kofmehl: 'I was following the old rule for 15 years, that is, keeping one-third in cash, one-
third in financial assets kept in a balanced portfolio and one-third in real estate. But markets are now so unpredictable and life cycles of economies are getting shorter.'
As a result, he makes drastic shifts from one asset class to another whenever he sees opportunities. Currently, he is holding more cash than usual, and fishing for undervalued equities and bonds.
It helps that he is in the business of managing money for high net-worth clients. Bank Julius Baer is part of the Julius Baer Group, a leading Swiss wealth management firm that targets private banking clients with three to five million Swiss francs (S$4.1 million to S$6.8 million) in investible assets.
Q:Are you a spender or a saver?
I'm mixed. I used to be more of a spender. I started to save more money after I turned 30.
As a private banker, I have developed the discipline to think in terms of medium- and long-term horizons. My current focus is on trying to achieve high returns from my investments so that I can spend more.
Q: What financial planning have you done for yourself?
For Swiss nationals, the key pillars are government-mandated investments, employee and employer contributions, life insurance for themselves and their families, and savings plans.
On top of these, I have real estate in Canada and Europe, and other financial instruments. Given current market conditions, I am active but cautious in equities and selective in emerging market bonds. Recently, I bought into a five-year Philippine bank bond that has a yield to maturity of 16 per cent.
I also have some theme-based investments in areas such as infrastructure and agriculture. Last but not least, I make some direct venture-capital investments.
Q: What's your investment philosophy?
I believe in absolute returns, not relative ones. For me, negative performance is not acceptable.
I'm happy with returns of 15 per cent to 20 per cent a year. Because of the earlier rebound in equity markets, I've achieved annual returns of 20-30 per cent over the past three years.
Q: Any other investments?
I invest in property. I have an apartment in Switzerland which was bought in 1989 for less than one million Swiss francs. Property values have risen steadily there but at a single-digit growth rate.
My wife inherited a cottage in Montreal that's more than a century old. Both properties are currently used by the family.
I don't collect wine but love drinking it. Recently, I came across a potential investment in different vineyards in 'old Europe' in, for instance, France and Italy.
The investment sum is set at US$250,000 (S$339,650) with projected annual returns of 40 per cent. I'm considering it.
Q: Moneywise, what were your growing-up years like?
I come from a regular European family. My parents loved to travel. I wasn't born with a silver spoon.
My dad was also in banking but later took up a government city-planning job. Mum was the best homemaker I ever knew. I was the only child, so I was very pampered.
Dad, who was more of a spender, didn't believe in saving money and spent whatever he had on weekend skiing trips and hobbies involving the family.
Q: What has been a bad investment?
During the 1987 big market crash, I invested 30,000 Swiss francs in Japanese equity warrants and lost all of it. I learnt then the importance of diversification.
Q: Your best investment to date?
My wife. Also, in the past few years, the equities market has had some fantastic runs.
Some of my investments have doubled in value. These include some of the smaller Singapore and Hong Kong stocks.
I also made some good long-term investments in hedge funds.
Q: And your home now is... ?
I live in a two-storey, four-bedroom house with a swimming pool. It's in the Tanglin area.
'It's very difficult to be in this business. Clients expect you to be on top of financial news 24/7. But it's a wonderful job,' said Julius Baer's head of private banking in South-east Asia.
When it comes to his personal financial plans, he points to his four key 'pillars', which include compulsory and voluntary savings schemes administered by the Swiss government. In addition, he has investments in properties and other financial instruments such as stocks, unit trusts and bonds.
Instead of relying on a passive buy-and-hold investment strategy, he has become more proactive in his investing approach in the past few years.
Said Mr Kofmehl: 'I was following the old rule for 15 years, that is, keeping one-third in cash, one-
third in financial assets kept in a balanced portfolio and one-third in real estate. But markets are now so unpredictable and life cycles of economies are getting shorter.'
As a result, he makes drastic shifts from one asset class to another whenever he sees opportunities. Currently, he is holding more cash than usual, and fishing for undervalued equities and bonds.
It helps that he is in the business of managing money for high net-worth clients. Bank Julius Baer is part of the Julius Baer Group, a leading Swiss wealth management firm that targets private banking clients with three to five million Swiss francs (S$4.1 million to S$6.8 million) in investible assets.
Q:Are you a spender or a saver?
I'm mixed. I used to be more of a spender. I started to save more money after I turned 30.
As a private banker, I have developed the discipline to think in terms of medium- and long-term horizons. My current focus is on trying to achieve high returns from my investments so that I can spend more.
Q: What financial planning have you done for yourself?
For Swiss nationals, the key pillars are government-mandated investments, employee and employer contributions, life insurance for themselves and their families, and savings plans.
On top of these, I have real estate in Canada and Europe, and other financial instruments. Given current market conditions, I am active but cautious in equities and selective in emerging market bonds. Recently, I bought into a five-year Philippine bank bond that has a yield to maturity of 16 per cent.
I also have some theme-based investments in areas such as infrastructure and agriculture. Last but not least, I make some direct venture-capital investments.
Q: What's your investment philosophy?
I believe in absolute returns, not relative ones. For me, negative performance is not acceptable.
I'm happy with returns of 15 per cent to 20 per cent a year. Because of the earlier rebound in equity markets, I've achieved annual returns of 20-30 per cent over the past three years.
Q: Any other investments?
I invest in property. I have an apartment in Switzerland which was bought in 1989 for less than one million Swiss francs. Property values have risen steadily there but at a single-digit growth rate.
My wife inherited a cottage in Montreal that's more than a century old. Both properties are currently used by the family.
I don't collect wine but love drinking it. Recently, I came across a potential investment in different vineyards in 'old Europe' in, for instance, France and Italy.
The investment sum is set at US$250,000 (S$339,650) with projected annual returns of 40 per cent. I'm considering it.
Q: Moneywise, what were your growing-up years like?
I come from a regular European family. My parents loved to travel. I wasn't born with a silver spoon.
My dad was also in banking but later took up a government city-planning job. Mum was the best homemaker I ever knew. I was the only child, so I was very pampered.
Dad, who was more of a spender, didn't believe in saving money and spent whatever he had on weekend skiing trips and hobbies involving the family.
Q: What has been a bad investment?
During the 1987 big market crash, I invested 30,000 Swiss francs in Japanese equity warrants and lost all of it. I learnt then the importance of diversification.
Q: Your best investment to date?
My wife. Also, in the past few years, the equities market has had some fantastic runs.
Some of my investments have doubled in value. These include some of the smaller Singapore and Hong Kong stocks.
I also made some good long-term investments in hedge funds.
Q: And your home now is... ?
I live in a two-storey, four-bedroom house with a swimming pool. It's in the Tanglin area.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Frosty February For Home Sales
Where Have All The Buyers Gone? URA released yesterday monthly price and sales data of new residential units sold in the month of February which continued to reaffirm our view on the uncertainty in the physical property market, translating to caution on the part of both developers and buyers, leading to overall soft sales of new units by developers, with new sales declining 47% m-o-m from 320 units in January to an anaemic 170 units in February.
Price Levels Generally Maintained. Prices, however, were generally maintained at previous levels for now though given the small volume of sales for the month, this may not be indicative of the overall pricing trend – as developers that have booked good sales in the past year and have improved their balance sheet could have the luxury of maintaining their asking prices for the moment.
Playing The Waiting Game. With the economic uncertainty arising from sub-prime concerns still weighing down sentiment in the property market, leaving both developers and buyers waiting on the sidelines for the near-term, no catalyst is in sight. The developers with more diversified landbanks and stronger balance sheets are at an advantage, as they can play this waiting game for longer – maintaining asking price levels while timing any new launches to cater to the market segment where demand is relatively strongest. Buyers, on the other hand, sensing a potential dip in prices, are also waiting and holding out from committing to any purchases.
With the waiting game likely to be played out for at least another quarter, we maintain our Neutral stance on the Residential Property Sector, since overall economic fundamentals for Singapore remain healthy in the medium-term.
Price Levels Generally Maintained. Prices, however, were generally maintained at previous levels for now though given the small volume of sales for the month, this may not be indicative of the overall pricing trend – as developers that have booked good sales in the past year and have improved their balance sheet could have the luxury of maintaining their asking prices for the moment.
Playing The Waiting Game. With the economic uncertainty arising from sub-prime concerns still weighing down sentiment in the property market, leaving both developers and buyers waiting on the sidelines for the near-term, no catalyst is in sight. The developers with more diversified landbanks and stronger balance sheets are at an advantage, as they can play this waiting game for longer – maintaining asking price levels while timing any new launches to cater to the market segment where demand is relatively strongest. Buyers, on the other hand, sensing a potential dip in prices, are also waiting and holding out from committing to any purchases.
With the waiting game likely to be played out for at least another quarter, we maintain our Neutral stance on the Residential Property Sector, since overall economic fundamentals for Singapore remain healthy in the medium-term.
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Stagflation
Singapore experienced stagflation in the 70s, same period as USA.
Stagflation in the 1970s
The term "stagflation" -- an economic condition of both continuing inflation and stagnant business activity, together with an increasing unemployment rate -- described the new economic malaise. Inflation seemed to feed on itself. People began to expect continuous increases in the price of goods, so they bought more. This increased demand pushed up prices, leading to demands for higher wages, which pushed
prices higher still in a continuing upward spiral. Labor contracts increasingly came to include automatic cost-of-living clauses, and the government began to peg some payments, such as those for Social Security, to the Consumer Price Index, the best-known gauge of inflation. While these practices helped workers and retirees cope
with inflation, they perpetuated inflation. The government's ever-rising need for funds swelled the budget deficit and led to greater government borrowing, which in turn pushed up interest rates and increased costs for businesses and consumers even further. With energy costs and interest rates high, business investment languished
and unemployment rose to uncomfortable levels.
In desperation, President Jimmy Carter (1977-1981) tried to combat economic weakness and unemployment by increasing government spending, and he established voluntary wage and price guidelines to control inflation. Both were largely unsuccessful. A perhaps more successful but less dramatic attack on inflation involved the "deregulation" of numerous industries, including airlines, trucking, and railroads.
These industries had been tightly regulated, with government controlling routes and fares. Support for deregulation continued beyond the Carter administration. In the 1980s, the government relaxed controls on bank interest rates and long-distance telephone service, and in the 1990s it moved to ease regulation of local
telephone service.
But the most important element in the war against inflation was the Federal Reserve Board, which clamped down hard on the money supply beginning in 1979. By refusing to supply all the money an inflation-ravaged economy wanted, the Fed caused interest rates to rise. As a result, consumer spending and business borrowing slowed abruptly. The economy soon fell into a deep recession.
What's more frightening inflation or recession?
The answer, of course, is both. Accelerating prices and a slow- or no-growth economy is a killer combo that's been called "stagflation" since the 1960s.
Folks of a certain age might remember the stagflation which dominated the US economy in the 1970s. It was a gloomy time when energy prices (and gasoline lines) dominated the news; when whole industries slumped at the same time, and when job losses and price hikes seemed to travel in tandem.
Now, some Federal Reserve-watchers are suggesting we're facing it again.
Remarks in the Fed's latest policy statement "just scream stagflation" writes investment blogger Tim Iacono. The word "stagflation" was mentioned some 2,480 times in recent blog postings, according to online monitor Technorati.com.
It's easy to see where the concerns come from. On the recession side, there's the housing slump, the worsening mortgage market, the continued loss of jobs to lower-paid workers in developing countries and -- as Circuit City recently proved with 3,400 pay-related layoffs -- right here at home. Pay raises have been blah for several years running. If you're looking for inflation signs, you need look no further than February's 1.3 percent gain in producer prices and 0.4 percent rise in consumer prices. But you can look at the accelerating price of manufacturing supplies reported by companies across many industries in the Institute for Supply Management. Or just check what you're paying for healthcare, college tuition, gasoline, or that monthly mortgage.
These economic trends are worrisome, though there are some reasons not to fear a recurrence of the 70s. Interest rates are starting much lower, and the Fed's fear of inflation borders on paranoia. Slow wage growth and jobs should hold prices down, too. The 1970s forces that really pushed markets over the top -- an oil embargo and a family's cornering of the silver market -- aren't in evidence now, and even
homeowners who have seen home prices slide recently are still sitting on a lot of equity. The easy-money credit markets could keep consumers bolstering demand. But, things do fall apart in ever-different ways, so it makes sense to position yourself for "all of the above" without going overboard. Here are some pointers:
Don't go overboard. Overboard behaviors include selling all of your stocks, bonds, and your house and putting the money into gold, palladium, art, or any other commodity that doesn't pay dividends or interest or have earnings.
Worry about yourself first. Collectively, consumers do need to continue spending to keep the economy on the move. But it's probably better for your own finances to shirk this responsibility for a while. Reign in spending and start paying off credit card balances and other bills in the biggest chunks possible.
Organize your debts. Stagflation, the last time around, saw interest rates rising to usurious levels. Use the time you have now to lock in decent fixed-rate mortgages, transfer balances to low-rate cards, or use other loan products on the market to keep your debts manageable and stable.
Stay invested and diversified. Stocks may not be great every year, but as long-term places to keep money, they beat bonds, gold, and shoe boxes all to heck. Keep your retirement fund in a mix of stocks, foreign stocks, bonds, and more. Even if bad times come, spreading your money around will moderate the impact.
Keep an inflation kicker. Mining stocks, inflation bonds, real estate investment funds, natural resources mutual funds all have pros and cons, but you'll be happy with any of them if we undergo a period of runaway inflation. Keep a corner of your portfolio reserved for this.
Typically, that's no more than 10 percent.
Invest in yourself. You may not be able to count on your salary going up in tandem with the costs of living. But the right computer, management, or language course could position you for a better (and better-paying) job.
Save money. The worst part of stagflation is that it makes it harder and harder to save any money. The more cash you have to call upon in an emergency, the less desperate or destitute you'll be.
Stagflation in the 1970s
The term "stagflation" -- an economic condition of both continuing inflation and stagnant business activity, together with an increasing unemployment rate -- described the new economic malaise. Inflation seemed to feed on itself. People began to expect continuous increases in the price of goods, so they bought more. This increased demand pushed up prices, leading to demands for higher wages, which pushed
prices higher still in a continuing upward spiral. Labor contracts increasingly came to include automatic cost-of-living clauses, and the government began to peg some payments, such as those for Social Security, to the Consumer Price Index, the best-known gauge of inflation. While these practices helped workers and retirees cope
with inflation, they perpetuated inflation. The government's ever-rising need for funds swelled the budget deficit and led to greater government borrowing, which in turn pushed up interest rates and increased costs for businesses and consumers even further. With energy costs and interest rates high, business investment languished
and unemployment rose to uncomfortable levels.
In desperation, President Jimmy Carter (1977-1981) tried to combat economic weakness and unemployment by increasing government spending, and he established voluntary wage and price guidelines to control inflation. Both were largely unsuccessful. A perhaps more successful but less dramatic attack on inflation involved the "deregulation" of numerous industries, including airlines, trucking, and railroads.
These industries had been tightly regulated, with government controlling routes and fares. Support for deregulation continued beyond the Carter administration. In the 1980s, the government relaxed controls on bank interest rates and long-distance telephone service, and in the 1990s it moved to ease regulation of local
telephone service.
But the most important element in the war against inflation was the Federal Reserve Board, which clamped down hard on the money supply beginning in 1979. By refusing to supply all the money an inflation-ravaged economy wanted, the Fed caused interest rates to rise. As a result, consumer spending and business borrowing slowed abruptly. The economy soon fell into a deep recession.
What's more frightening inflation or recession?
The answer, of course, is both. Accelerating prices and a slow- or no-growth economy is a killer combo that's been called "stagflation" since the 1960s.
Folks of a certain age might remember the stagflation which dominated the US economy in the 1970s. It was a gloomy time when energy prices (and gasoline lines) dominated the news; when whole industries slumped at the same time, and when job losses and price hikes seemed to travel in tandem.
Now, some Federal Reserve-watchers are suggesting we're facing it again.
Remarks in the Fed's latest policy statement "just scream stagflation" writes investment blogger Tim Iacono. The word "stagflation" was mentioned some 2,480 times in recent blog postings, according to online monitor Technorati.com.
It's easy to see where the concerns come from. On the recession side, there's the housing slump, the worsening mortgage market, the continued loss of jobs to lower-paid workers in developing countries and -- as Circuit City recently proved with 3,400 pay-related layoffs -- right here at home. Pay raises have been blah for several years running. If you're looking for inflation signs, you need look no further than February's 1.3 percent gain in producer prices and 0.4 percent rise in consumer prices. But you can look at the accelerating price of manufacturing supplies reported by companies across many industries in the Institute for Supply Management. Or just check what you're paying for healthcare, college tuition, gasoline, or that monthly mortgage.
These economic trends are worrisome, though there are some reasons not to fear a recurrence of the 70s. Interest rates are starting much lower, and the Fed's fear of inflation borders on paranoia. Slow wage growth and jobs should hold prices down, too. The 1970s forces that really pushed markets over the top -- an oil embargo and a family's cornering of the silver market -- aren't in evidence now, and even
homeowners who have seen home prices slide recently are still sitting on a lot of equity. The easy-money credit markets could keep consumers bolstering demand. But, things do fall apart in ever-different ways, so it makes sense to position yourself for "all of the above" without going overboard. Here are some pointers:
Don't go overboard. Overboard behaviors include selling all of your stocks, bonds, and your house and putting the money into gold, palladium, art, or any other commodity that doesn't pay dividends or interest or have earnings.
Worry about yourself first. Collectively, consumers do need to continue spending to keep the economy on the move. But it's probably better for your own finances to shirk this responsibility for a while. Reign in spending and start paying off credit card balances and other bills in the biggest chunks possible.
Organize your debts. Stagflation, the last time around, saw interest rates rising to usurious levels. Use the time you have now to lock in decent fixed-rate mortgages, transfer balances to low-rate cards, or use other loan products on the market to keep your debts manageable and stable.
Stay invested and diversified. Stocks may not be great every year, but as long-term places to keep money, they beat bonds, gold, and shoe boxes all to heck. Keep your retirement fund in a mix of stocks, foreign stocks, bonds, and more. Even if bad times come, spreading your money around will moderate the impact.
Keep an inflation kicker. Mining stocks, inflation bonds, real estate investment funds, natural resources mutual funds all have pros and cons, but you'll be happy with any of them if we undergo a period of runaway inflation. Keep a corner of your portfolio reserved for this.
Typically, that's no more than 10 percent.
Invest in yourself. You may not be able to count on your salary going up in tandem with the costs of living. But the right computer, management, or language course could position you for a better (and better-paying) job.
Save money. The worst part of stagflation is that it makes it harder and harder to save any money. The more cash you have to call upon in an emergency, the less desperate or destitute you'll be.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Did Monday mark the bottom of the stock market's correction that began last fall?
Tuesday's explosive rally surely gives ammunition to those who say, "Yes." By rallying more than 400 points, the Dow Jones Industrial Average on Tuesday turned in the biggest percentage gain in over five years.
But this correction has seen explosive rallies before that turned out not to mark the final bottom. So it behooves us to dig deeper.
I turn first to investment newsletter sentiment. A contrarian analysis of that data supports the notion that Monday was the end of the correction, since in recent sessions enough editors have turned bearish -- in effect throwing in the towel.
Consider the latest readings of the Hulbert Stock Newsletter Sentiment Index, which reflects the average recommended stock market exposure among a subset of several dozen short-term market timing newsletters tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest. At minus 22.5%, the HSNSI is even lower than it was at the beginning of last week, when I had already concluded that the market was close to a bottom.
In fact, the HSNSI is now lower than it has been since October 2005, some two and one-half years ago. This is a big contrast to the sentiment situation that existed at the Jan. 22 market low, when the editor of the average market-timing newsletter wasn't even as bearish as he was during the market's corrections of last summer and fall.
Technical support for the idea that the correction's bottom has been seen comes from the market's diminished trading volume in recent weeks. Bob Brinker, editor of Bob Brinker's Marketimer, the newsletter with one of the best market-timing records over the last two decades, explained why in the March issue of his newsletter, published earlier this month:
"The process of establishing a stock market correction bottom has unfolded in text-book fashion over the past two months. This process involves the establishment of an initial closing low, followed by a short-term rally, followed by testing of the area of the prior established closing low on reduced trading volume ... The correction bottoming process (over the past few weeks) has seen a significant reduction in selling pressure in the vicinity of the Jan. 22 closing low. This is a very important aspect of any successful test."
Yet another perspective, which also supports the notion that a bottom of at least some import has been registered, comes from Richard Russell, editor of Dow Theory Letters. Though Russell is officially bearish on the stock market's primary trend, he has noted in recent weeks a potentially bullish non-confirmation in the refusal of the Dow Jones Transportation Average to join the Dow in breaking its January low.
Writing before the close on Tuesday, Russell wrote that, at Monday's close, "The market was severely oversold. But what interested me was that the market was not only oversold -- but it was severely oversold in the face of a flagrant non-confirmation on the part of the Transports. This unusually bullish combination provided the basis for a violent turnaround. In fact, it could turn out to be more than 'just a turnaround.' Ideally, what I'd like to see now is a 90% day on the upside. If that were to occur, we could be seeing a key reversal -- with the stock market perhaps having discounted the worst that can be seen ahead."
By the close on Tuesday, Russell's wish for a 90% up day apparently was granted: Up volume on the NYSE represented almost precisely 90% of the combined up and down volume on the exchange.
But this correction has seen explosive rallies before that turned out not to mark the final bottom. So it behooves us to dig deeper.
I turn first to investment newsletter sentiment. A contrarian analysis of that data supports the notion that Monday was the end of the correction, since in recent sessions enough editors have turned bearish -- in effect throwing in the towel.
Consider the latest readings of the Hulbert Stock Newsletter Sentiment Index, which reflects the average recommended stock market exposure among a subset of several dozen short-term market timing newsletters tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest. At minus 22.5%, the HSNSI is even lower than it was at the beginning of last week, when I had already concluded that the market was close to a bottom.
In fact, the HSNSI is now lower than it has been since October 2005, some two and one-half years ago. This is a big contrast to the sentiment situation that existed at the Jan. 22 market low, when the editor of the average market-timing newsletter wasn't even as bearish as he was during the market's corrections of last summer and fall.
Technical support for the idea that the correction's bottom has been seen comes from the market's diminished trading volume in recent weeks. Bob Brinker, editor of Bob Brinker's Marketimer, the newsletter with one of the best market-timing records over the last two decades, explained why in the March issue of his newsletter, published earlier this month:
"The process of establishing a stock market correction bottom has unfolded in text-book fashion over the past two months. This process involves the establishment of an initial closing low, followed by a short-term rally, followed by testing of the area of the prior established closing low on reduced trading volume ... The correction bottoming process (over the past few weeks) has seen a significant reduction in selling pressure in the vicinity of the Jan. 22 closing low. This is a very important aspect of any successful test."
Yet another perspective, which also supports the notion that a bottom of at least some import has been registered, comes from Richard Russell, editor of Dow Theory Letters. Though Russell is officially bearish on the stock market's primary trend, he has noted in recent weeks a potentially bullish non-confirmation in the refusal of the Dow Jones Transportation Average to join the Dow in breaking its January low.
Writing before the close on Tuesday, Russell wrote that, at Monday's close, "The market was severely oversold. But what interested me was that the market was not only oversold -- but it was severely oversold in the face of a flagrant non-confirmation on the part of the Transports. This unusually bullish combination provided the basis for a violent turnaround. In fact, it could turn out to be more than 'just a turnaround.' Ideally, what I'd like to see now is a 90% day on the upside. If that were to occur, we could be seeing a key reversal -- with the stock market perhaps having discounted the worst that can be seen ahead."
By the close on Tuesday, Russell's wish for a 90% up day apparently was granted: Up volume on the NYSE represented almost precisely 90% of the combined up and down volume on the exchange.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
美次贷危机损失可能超过7200亿美元
次贷危机是美国经济进入下降周期的结果而非原因。自2002年以来的经济增长周期消费增长起着核心作用，而消费动力来自于房地产和金融资产升值带来的财富增加。在房地产的繁荣中，以次级债为代表的金融创新是最有力的推动因素，房地产与金融的互动是资产投资收益不断攀升的主要拉动力。次级房贷的扩张增加了对房屋的有效需求，推动了价格上涨和刺激了房屋建设。但是以资产投资收益刺激消费所带来的经济增长超过了美国经济实际的增长潜力，是无法持续的，在以房地产价格为标志的资产价格达到高点以后经济进入下降周期不可避免。随着经济进入下降周期，次债危机随后发生，是本轮经济周期中以房地产刺激经济的必然结果。
目前各金融机构已经公布的损失超过了1000亿美元，我们以美联储与IMF等机构所公布的数据为基础，计算出与次贷相关的风险资产总额约35000亿美元，估计的损失可能超过7200亿美元。目前美股跌幅远低于此前东南亚金融危机与新经济泡沫破裂后的市场跌幅，同时由于对滞涨担忧的加剧，我们认为，美股跌破1月底美联储救市以后形成的平台将是不可避免的。
目前各金融机构已经公布的损失超过了1000亿美元，我们以美联储与IMF等机构所公布的数据为基础，计算出与次贷相关的风险资产总额约35000亿美元，估计的损失可能超过7200亿美元。目前美股跌幅远低于此前东南亚金融危机与新经济泡沫破裂后的市场跌幅，同时由于对滞涨担忧的加剧，我们认为，美股跌破1月底美联储救市以后形成的平台将是不可避免的。
Saturday, March 8, 2008
巴菲特让市场很受伤
巴菲特的衰退论一出，对美国经济尚抱希望的“乐观派”们有些茫然起来
毫无疑问，巴菲特是一个“活着的传奇”，他独特的市场见解和投资哲学被时间证明是投资界的金科玉律。所以当本周一巴菲特在接受美国电视台采访时给美国经济打上“衰退”标签，并表示不再愿为三大债券保险商MBIA、Ambac和FGIC的8000亿美元市政债券提供担保后，对美国经济尚抱有希望的“乐观派”们也不禁有些茫然起来。
我就是这信心动摇者中的一个。原因其实并不在于我是多么忠实的“巴迷”，而是在于巴菲特唱衰对美国经济中长期走向的潜在影响令人担忧。
实际上，巴菲特看空美国经济也并没有抛出令人信服的论据，而仅仅只是表明了一种玄妙的、所谓“常识性”的感觉。
虽然现在正值风声鹤唳，但平心而论，还并没有足够的数据证明美国经济已经或即将步入衰退。2月28日确认后的2007年第四季度美国GDP增长依旧为黯淡的0.6％，但这一个时点的短期数据并不能说明任何趋势问题。读懂美国经济的关键，实际上在于参透其结构特征。众所周知美国GDP中消费占据七成，投资和净出口占比分别为15％和10％左右，比这些比例数字更重要且更不易察觉的核心特征是，消费是中长期增长的稳定主引擎，而投资波动往往是构成短期增长波动的主要原因。结合这个特征品味美国最新经济数据传递出的信息，很难嗅出衰退的味道。因为次贷风波后的2007年第四季度，美国投资的异常波动与经济增长骤然放缓如影随形，而美国长期消费倾向并没有显露出持续萎靡的迹象。
但巴菲特让这一切都有些变味了。投资大师对美国经济的悲观预期，与前期美联储前主席格林斯潘、美国经济研究局主席费尔德斯坦以及各类权威人士的“衰退论”相互映照，给市场信心带来致命打击。这种来自权威的预期对美国经济中长期走向的影响不容忽视。从行为金融学的理论观点来看，美国战后透支消费、超前消费和炫耀性消费中凸显的欲望、张扬和享乐特征，是“美国梦”的经济表现，其深入骨髓的乐观倾向支撑了美国透支式消费的长久维持。从某种意义上讲，美国经济持续增长很大程度上是因为大多数美国人都坚信美国经济将持续增长，并无所畏惧地维系着强势的消费倾向。
巴菲特的论断可能会让美国人真正害怕起来，而预期走弱无疑将削弱美国消费的稳定趋势，从而进一步加大美国经济陷入衰退的风险。而这一点，正是让我害怕，并真正担心起美国经济未来的根本原因。
至于巴菲特唱衰美国经济的原因，以我的智慧显然无法领悟。我只是依稀记得，巴菲特在那个被人津津乐道的2008年致股东信中说过：“要当心那些油嘴滑舌的所谓专家顾问，当你被他们的夸夸其谈骗得头脑发热，就是他们填满自己腰包的时候。”而且我们都知道巴菲特虽然很有钱，但作为商人，他不可能丢掉赚钱的原始本性。
毫无疑问，巴菲特先高调抛出8000亿美元救市计划，再断言衰退并宣布放弃拯救，对市场信心而言就像是一种使人“从天堂到地狱”的双倍打击。
那么如果美国经济真陷入衰退了，巴菲特会获得什么好处吗？一种可能比较肤浅的猜测是，也许此前宣称“未到抄底时机”的巴菲特会因此找到一个合适的抄底时机？而且，就算跌跌不休之中连抄底时机都没有，至少多元化的巴菲特还能继续将投资目光投向璀璨的新兴市场。
不管巴菲特意欲何为，他的唱衰论调无疑会让市场很受伤。
毫无疑问，巴菲特是一个“活着的传奇”，他独特的市场见解和投资哲学被时间证明是投资界的金科玉律。所以当本周一巴菲特在接受美国电视台采访时给美国经济打上“衰退”标签，并表示不再愿为三大债券保险商MBIA、Ambac和FGIC的8000亿美元市政债券提供担保后，对美国经济尚抱有希望的“乐观派”们也不禁有些茫然起来。
我就是这信心动摇者中的一个。原因其实并不在于我是多么忠实的“巴迷”，而是在于巴菲特唱衰对美国经济中长期走向的潜在影响令人担忧。
实际上，巴菲特看空美国经济也并没有抛出令人信服的论据，而仅仅只是表明了一种玄妙的、所谓“常识性”的感觉。
虽然现在正值风声鹤唳，但平心而论，还并没有足够的数据证明美国经济已经或即将步入衰退。2月28日确认后的2007年第四季度美国GDP增长依旧为黯淡的0.6％，但这一个时点的短期数据并不能说明任何趋势问题。读懂美国经济的关键，实际上在于参透其结构特征。众所周知美国GDP中消费占据七成，投资和净出口占比分别为15％和10％左右，比这些比例数字更重要且更不易察觉的核心特征是，消费是中长期增长的稳定主引擎，而投资波动往往是构成短期增长波动的主要原因。结合这个特征品味美国最新经济数据传递出的信息，很难嗅出衰退的味道。因为次贷风波后的2007年第四季度，美国投资的异常波动与经济增长骤然放缓如影随形，而美国长期消费倾向并没有显露出持续萎靡的迹象。
但巴菲特让这一切都有些变味了。投资大师对美国经济的悲观预期，与前期美联储前主席格林斯潘、美国经济研究局主席费尔德斯坦以及各类权威人士的“衰退论”相互映照，给市场信心带来致命打击。这种来自权威的预期对美国经济中长期走向的影响不容忽视。从行为金融学的理论观点来看，美国战后透支消费、超前消费和炫耀性消费中凸显的欲望、张扬和享乐特征，是“美国梦”的经济表现，其深入骨髓的乐观倾向支撑了美国透支式消费的长久维持。从某种意义上讲，美国经济持续增长很大程度上是因为大多数美国人都坚信美国经济将持续增长，并无所畏惧地维系着强势的消费倾向。
巴菲特的论断可能会让美国人真正害怕起来，而预期走弱无疑将削弱美国消费的稳定趋势，从而进一步加大美国经济陷入衰退的风险。而这一点，正是让我害怕，并真正担心起美国经济未来的根本原因。
至于巴菲特唱衰美国经济的原因，以我的智慧显然无法领悟。我只是依稀记得，巴菲特在那个被人津津乐道的2008年致股东信中说过：“要当心那些油嘴滑舌的所谓专家顾问，当你被他们的夸夸其谈骗得头脑发热，就是他们填满自己腰包的时候。”而且我们都知道巴菲特虽然很有钱，但作为商人，他不可能丢掉赚钱的原始本性。
毫无疑问，巴菲特先高调抛出8000亿美元救市计划，再断言衰退并宣布放弃拯救，对市场信心而言就像是一种使人“从天堂到地狱”的双倍打击。
那么如果美国经济真陷入衰退了，巴菲特会获得什么好处吗？一种可能比较肤浅的猜测是，也许此前宣称“未到抄底时机”的巴菲特会因此找到一个合适的抄底时机？而且，就算跌跌不休之中连抄底时机都没有，至少多元化的巴菲特还能继续将投资目光投向璀璨的新兴市场。
不管巴菲特意欲何为，他的唱衰论调无疑会让市场很受伤。
价值投资已经不管用了
A股已经进入“牛市下半场”了.
牛市下半场”有四个基本特征：
一是板块之间移动快速，
二是个股暴涨暴跌现象严重，
三是赚了指数赔了股价，
四是与国际股市联动加强。
这种情况下股民该如何操作呢？
下半场肯定还会“高潮迭起”，但是这种市场环境下价值投资已经不管用了，因为已经不存在“价值洼地”了，下面必须完全依靠技术分析才能取胜，股民尤其应该注意对消息的收集和分析。
牛市下半场”有四个基本特征：
一是板块之间移动快速，
二是个股暴涨暴跌现象严重，
三是赚了指数赔了股价，
四是与国际股市联动加强。
这种情况下股民该如何操作呢？
下半场肯定还会“高潮迭起”，但是这种市场环境下价值投资已经不管用了，因为已经不存在“价值洼地”了，下面必须完全依靠技术分析才能取胜，股民尤其应该注意对消息的收集和分析。
熊市短线买卖股票纪律
* 强做多，弱做空，多持币，常轻仓（空仓）， 常捂资金短捂股。
*大盘强势60-80%仓位. 大盘弱势20-40%仓位. 千万别满仓（85%）
1. 大盘跌破25日均线和13日均线则轻仓或空仓休息，大盘不站稳13日均线不加仓.
2 买股要选收盘股价站在25日均线上的.跌破25日均线的个股千万别买.
3. 各条均线成多头排列,个股股价在7日均线,13日均线,25日均线的上面.
4. 强势个股成交量缩量收阴线,股价在盘中有触击7日均线或13日均线后收起成下影线,在7日均线或13日均线附近大胆买入.买错也要买.（注意7日均线或13日均线的买点）.
5. 必须选择近5天内最少有3天主力大单动向收红的强势股.
6. 买了个股股价超过7日均线的1.1倍则一定要止赢.
7. 个股股价收盘连续2天跌破13日均线,则一定要止损全卖,卖错也要卖.
8. 任何股票买入后不赚钱一律不得补仓, 弱市中涨5%就卖, 跌破13日均线也卖，无论那只股票，只要亏损达到10%立即割了，永远不要再看他！因为你和他前世无缘！
9. 买进股票的时机最好选择下午2：30以后，第二天开盘有盈利5-10%个点立即卖出.
10. 知足常乐. 千万不能贪. 贪则贫. 个股有赚坚决减仓.
*大盘强势60-80%仓位. 大盘弱势20-40%仓位. 千万别满仓（85%）
1. 大盘跌破25日均线和13日均线则轻仓或空仓休息，大盘不站稳13日均线不加仓.
2 买股要选收盘股价站在25日均线上的.跌破25日均线的个股千万别买.
3. 各条均线成多头排列,个股股价在7日均线,13日均线,25日均线的上面.
4. 强势个股成交量缩量收阴线,股价在盘中有触击7日均线或13日均线后收起成下影线,在7日均线或13日均线附近大胆买入.买错也要买.（注意7日均线或13日均线的买点）.
5. 必须选择近5天内最少有3天主力大单动向收红的强势股.
6. 买了个股股价超过7日均线的1.1倍则一定要止赢.
7. 个股股价收盘连续2天跌破13日均线,则一定要止损全卖,卖错也要卖.
8. 任何股票买入后不赚钱一律不得补仓, 弱市中涨5%就卖, 跌破13日均线也卖，无论那只股票，只要亏损达到10%立即割了，永远不要再看他！因为你和他前世无缘！
9. 买进股票的时机最好选择下午2：30以后，第二天开盘有盈利5-10%个点立即卖出.
10. 知足常乐. 千万不能贪. 贪则贫. 个股有赚坚决减仓.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)